Analysis of post-structuralist perspective, affect and shape
The book is in Russian. 18 pages of the book in English, represent the total overview of the entire book
This book is largely the result of failed attempts to read / learn Gemara of the Babylonian Talmud, the classic 4 standards inherited from Hellenism, - according to the canons of logic or by the canons of rhetoric. The text of the Gemara was reducible to any syllogistically justifies the reading (in the Aristotelian sense, topics, and on the Stoics - logic). Then an attempt was made to justify the possibility of reading 5 rhetorically means Stagirite rhetoric, but the text is shown to not be reduced to the classical and rhetorical forms.
However, the rhetoric remains the only way to justify the logic of the text can not be reduced Gemara. To justify the possibility of such a reading of the text is required to describe his own rhetorical device, in many ways different from the classical (post-) Aristotle - a device that can only be called a rhetorical, in the sense of its difference from the classical Aristotelian rhetoric 6.
Strictly speaking, the task of this book may be supplied only in the unfolded state. However, to put it briefly, se challenge is that, on the one hand, using the means of (post-) Aristotelian rhetoric to describe / justify the possibility of such a theoretical rhetoric, which would correspond to the practical rhetoric Gemara, on the other hand, define the limits of applicability of the (post-) aristotelsvskoy rhetoric to such a description.
1 We are not talking here about traditional ways of reading the text, fixed after the Gemara.
1 It is about the possibility of a live reading, and only this, and not on the identification of meaning in the text, known from other sources, or from the teachers of the comments.
6 Rhetoric different from the logic based on the syllogism, the concept entim-we, that is owned in mind, but unpronounceable in this speech community of the syllogism, which is given by its unpronounceable and it disappears as soon as it is displayed in full as part of the syllogism, it is in the time of its launch in the speech disappears keep her speech community. Wed: Aristotle. Rhetoric. "There are two kinds of enthymemes, some demonstrations, [showing] that something exists or does not exist, others - incriminating. [...] The exponential entim-ma syllogism is built on the basis of assumptions are recognized as enthymeme invective - to parcels syllogism is not recognized "(Rit. 1396b, Lane. N. Plato). Enthymeme, according to Aristotle, is what is implied in the question, as opposed to a complete syllogism, leaving no space implied. Cf. Also: "With regard to speech (logoz), there are three things that need to be discussed: firstly where are the means of persuasion (pisteiz), the second syllable of (lexiz), and thirdly, on the manner in which to dispose of the speech . About the means of persuasion has been said, and the number of sources that only <sources> three, and why not more, that is, all are convinced either own mood, at sentencing, or those for whom taking speaking or evidence.
Said about the enthymeme, where they should draw, namely, among them are private (___) enthymeme and generalities (____). Now it should be said about the syllable because it enough to have that talk, but we need <to know> how to speak, and it helps a lot of speech to make an impression "(Rit. 1403b. Lane. S. Ave-rintseva). The rhetoric has been persuasive speech and operates enthymeme and topic 'logical' strictness of speech and operates full syllogisms.
(Note that already have Boethius enthymeme "logiziruetsya" is reduced to "incomplete syllogism.")
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FROM THE EDITOR
Introduction
Chapter One
TEXT In the Babylonian Gemara
Text functions Gemara
The otherness of the text tradition
Narrative approach
Paradigmatic approach
The rhythmic exposition 41
Technical Exposition
Paradigmatic statement of
Table detection of fathers and offspring damages
in the treatise Baba Kama 2a-Sb 112
Table detection of fathers and offspring damages
in the treatise Baba Kama 2a-Sb
Paradigmatic figures
Table of figures isolated on the repeatability (custom)
Stir in the text: generalization or extension
Chapter Two
AGAINST THE RHETORIC:
Speech and representation
Chapter Three
Gemar, CENTO
Chapter Four
LOCATION PROBLEM OF TEXT
Chapter Five
PHILOSOPHY OF GRAMMAR Talmud.
By the statement of the problem Achron Aeon and Olam
A reference to another
Chapter Six
AGAINST ALLEGOREZISA: MOSES AND CHARACTER
Communication with Lacan
Summary of psychosis
Truth and ethnicity
Machines Lacan
Ferocious ignorance Hawaii
The ambivalence of affect
INSTEAD OF A CONCLUSION
PLACE OF SPEECH "sentenced" by Kafka.
SUMMARY
The statement of the book's purpose
Abstract of chapters
Chapter One. Text's Functions in the Gemara of the Bavli
Chapter Two. Contra Rhetoric: Speech and Representation
Chapter Three. The Gemara, The Cento
Chapter Four. The Problem of Text's Disposition
Chapter Five. The Talmud's Philosophy of Grammar
Chapter Six.Contra Allegorizing: Moses and Symbol
Instead of Conclusion. Position of Speech in Kafka's «das Urteil»
SELECTED REFERENCES
English
Russian
